The largest recent settlement in a mesh class action lawsuit was awarded to Patricia Mesigian in May 2019. The jury allotted $50 million in compensatory damages and $30 million in punitive damages. Musicians, who underwent POP surgery using Ethicon’s Prolift mesh in 2008, suffered from pain, inflammation, infections, and scar tissue. She also lost her vaginal lining to the mesh. Although there has been no recall of the mesh, the FDA has urged the company to settle more cases.
As a result, the manufacturers of mesh have been forced to recall their products. While some of these recalls were for minor issues, others were due to underlying safety concerns. The FDA’s Medical Device Recall Database lists all mesh recalls. This information is vital to patients who may need to replace their mesh in the future. If you believe you may have been affected by a faulty device, you should file a lawsuit right away.
More than 30,000 mesh lawsuits are pending against several manufacturers, with millions of dollars awarded to individual plaintiffs.
The cases have been consolidated in MDLs in Georgia, West Virginia, and New Jersey. A recent case in Georgia awarded Christine Scott $5.5 million in damages for injuries she suffered from a C.R. Bard Avaulta mesh. Ultimately, she had eight surgeries to correct the problems. There is a chance you can be a part of a mesh class action lawsuit.
While the plaintiffs in a mesh class action lawsuit would not get the chance to decide whether to settle their claims in a mesh class action. Instead, they would go through a trial in front of a jury of their peers. The process is not perfect, but it is the best way to make sure your case is heard. Just make sure you do your research before filing a suit. You might not want to make a decision based on what others say.
Another mesh class-action lawsuit filed in federal court is being heard in an MDL in Rhode Island.
It is a consolidated collection of cases involving the Kugel implant. After the first bellwether trial, the remaining 2,600 mesh lawsuits were resolved. In August 2010, a federal jury awarded Thorpe $1.5 million in damages. The resulting MDL was subsequently settled in state and federal court. There is also a similar case in California involving the Atrium.
The number of mesh class action lawsuits is growing rapidly. In Florida alone, more than 2,000 women have filed this lawsuit. The FDA has issued a final ruling in more than half of them. If you have a similar case, contact a lawyer in your state and find out how to file your lawsuit. There are also many federal court-certified hernia mesh class action suits. So, in Florida, it is important to contact the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to learn more about the situation.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has started recalling hernia mesh products since 2005.
These meshes have caused injuries that require revision surgery. As a result, patients are suing the manufacturers for compensation. The companies are responsible for these injuries and are being held liable. In the United States, there are thousands of hernia mesh class action lawsuits pending against the manufacturer. They are being trialed in a Bellwether trial, which is a test case for the claims filed by plaintiffs.
The FDA is urging all companies to voluntarily recall the meshes they make.
The manufacturers of the meshes have been recalled tens of thousands of times. Some of these recalls were for minor issues, but many cases were based on significant health risks. The FDA has published a list of all these mesh recalls. Patients must understand the risk of these types of surgical procedures.
The FDA began recalling hernia mesh products in 2005. The products were found to have various problems, including manufacturing errors and causing serious injuries. In 2014, a Florida jury awarded each woman $6 million. However, Boston Scientific appealed the verdict, and the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the $26.7 million verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs. The FDA is also investigating the cases in other states, and the manufacturer may be held responsible for a recall.
